From: Jon S. <jon...@gm...> - 2005-05-25 15:52:37
|
On 5/25/05, Michel D=E4nzer <mi...@da...> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 11:30 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > > On 5/25/05, Michel D=E4nzer <mi...@da...> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 11:08 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > > > > On 5/25/05, Michel D=E4nzer <mi...@da...> wrote: > > > > > > Software generated will be supported sooner or later but the co= de is > > > > > > not written yet. > > > > > > > > > > These claims of yours have been refuted on the dri-egl list. Why = are you > > > > > repeating them here? > > > > > > > > I'm writing the Xegl server and I can tell you for sure that I have= n't > > > > written the software cursor support yet. How can you know the statu= s > > > > of the Xgl code when I haven't checked it into CVS yet? > > > > > > David Reveman pointed out that Xglx has working software cursor code.= I > > > can't see that caring about whether glitz uses a GLX or EGL backend. > > > > Xglx gets it software cursor support from the nested X server it runs > > inside of. >=20 > You didn't even read David's correction of this. Great. If there is a working software cursor implementation in Xgl I'm yet to find it. Of course I am looking at 5,000+ lines of code without a single comment other than the copyright notice. On the other hand I can definitely see how the xnest cursor implementation is working. Feel free to help with Xegl. I have stated several times that I know nothing about the X input system. I've identified exactly where to hook up hardware cursor support and that would let me proceed from where I am at. --=20 Jon Smirl jon...@gm... |