Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] [PATCH] fbdev: workaround for broken X servers

[Benjamin H. <be...@ke...>]

> > Index: linux-work/drivers/video/fbmem.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-work.orig/drivers/video/fbmem.c	2004-10-26 13:15:55.000000000 +1000
> > +++ linux-work/drivers/video/fbmem.c	2004-11-03 13:10:41.324932256 +1100
> > @@ -748,6 +748,10 @@
> >  	u16 *black = NULL;
> >  	int err = 0;
> >  	
> > +	/* Workaround for broken X servers */
> > +	if (blank > VESA_POWERDOWN)
> > +		blank = VESA_POWERDOWN;
> > +
> >  	if (info->fbops->fb_blank && !info->fbops->fb_blank(blank, info))
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> 
> This goes against documented behaviour (see fb.h). Also drivers/char/vt.c 
> seems to agree with fb.h, as do at least atyfb and matroxfb. I also used 
> the vesa level+1 convention in DirectFB. So AFAICS this patch would 
> confuse console power management, XFree86/X.Org, DirectFB and some fb 
> drivers.

Ok, can we agree here on what has to be done ? X is hard-coding numbers
that don't seem to be make any sense vs. our constants. In radeonfb, I
used switch case on constants, not +1, so there is something I'm not
getting. Besides, radeon always try to power down TFT panels when
blank != 0, maybe I should improve that ... What is this +1 thing, where
does it comes from ?

Ben.