From: Xiaofan C. <xia...@gm...> - 2011-02-24 07:45:26
|
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Peter Stuge <pe...@st...> wrote: > Pete Batard wrote: >> it looks to me like we should be able to work with an extended >> version of the WinUSB API to provide the unconstrained >> functionality required for libusb-1.0. > > Great if true! Important for me that no DLL is required besides > libusb-1.0.dll, regardless of which kernel driver is used, but I > think this is also what is intended. > I am not sure what you mean here. For the WinUSB backend, then you need the winusb.dll. For the new libusbK backend, you will need the libusbk.dll. -- Xiaofan |