From: Rolf M. <ro...@mi...> - 2005-04-02 13:00:51
|
Dear Steffen, thank you so much for continuing to look into this. On Apr 1, 2005 2:45 PM, Steffen Petersen <ste...@tu...> wrote: > I have also evaluated results on a fieldpoint line that crosses the envelope (see results below). At this, I also get sufficiently > accurat results close to the envelope (x=1). Hence, the problem may stem from the evaluation of results. How do you > proceed to obtain your results? I did it by calling GMVIO(mesh).write_equation_systems (filename, equation_systems); which was obviously not quite as good as what you did. Could you please let us know how you got the accurate answer? Did you call the function "compute_data()" at some point to include the exp(-jkr) term as you suggested in your e-mail on infinite elements of January 5th this year? - Would that be the right thing to do even for nodes which are shared between finite and infinite elements? Best wishes, Rolf __________________________________________________________ Mit WEB.DE FreePhone mit hoechster Qualitaet ab 0 Ct./Min. weltweit telefonieren! http://freephone.web.de/?mc=021201 |