From: Roy S. <roy...@ic...> - 2012-12-05 19:43:06
|
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, David Knezevic wrote: > So I'd like to add an indefinite dot-product to libMesh. Any thoughts on > the API? A separate "indefinite_dot" method in NumericVector? Or a > boolean argument (with default value to maintain API backwards > compatibility) in the existing dot method? I'd prefer a separate method. > Also, on a related note, I posted to libmesh-users about > add_vector_tranpose and how I'd like it to do a conjugate-tranpose in > the complex-valued case (perhaps toggled with an optional boolean > argument as above?). I'd keep the existing behavior the way it is, but add a new method "add_vector_conjugate" or "add_vector_adjoint", or some name that clearly denotes a conjugate transpose, with the new behavior. Neither of these are extremely strong preferences. --- Roy |