On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Roy Stogner <roystgnr@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:

On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Vikram Garg wrote:

All,     I have tested out the functionality on a new example and things
seem to be working as desired. This patch is ready to go into trunk. Please
provide any comments/concerns, especially on the memory_solution_history.C
functions.

Since this doesn't really touch existing functionality very closely,
but just adds new methods and a couple default-to-noop function calls,
I was planning to add it to trunk ASAP; if anyone else wants to look
over the design and make suggestions it'd be appreciated, though.

Sorry, I'm way behind. I'll try and look at it tonight, but don't let me hold up committing.