On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Roy Stogner <roystgnr@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
This is the right way to do things in general, but the details get
*real* tricky - does the union mesh end up being made of
nearly-arbitrary polyhedra when the input meshes aren't aligned?

The meshes they showed us didn't end up as polyhedra... but I guess we'll see.  This is indeed *very* tricky... but for now I'm willing to just trust that it's going to work ;-)
 
I'd want to keep it pretty modular (e.g. ideally System shouldn't need
to know about DTK any more than it knows about Exodus) but I'd love to
see the support get in at the libMesh level.

Of course.  I described as a System providing a field... but that won't be the interface.  You'll call a function like:

dtk_object.provide_field(System & sys, std::string field);

So the System won't know about this at all... but any field from any system can be provided to the other codes through DTK.

Derek