Ben,

I thought this might be the case.  I'll try to make the interface agnostic of DTK or the MeshfreeInterpolation... or maybe the DTK stuff will use MeshfreeInterpolation... we'll see.

We have plans to use MeshfreeInterpolation internally for some stuff.... but we also have to support DTK for these external linkages...

Derek


On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) <benjamin.kirk-1@nasa.gov> wrote:
On Jan 17, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Derek Gaston <friedmud@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But... if DTK does what it claims to do... and does it well, it will be worth the pain....
>
> Derek

Interesting, this is exactly the problem I'm going after with the new MeshfreeInterpolation business, so it would be nice to come up with a design interface that could use either implementation to pass data.  Bypassing the mesh altogether has been my first approach for dealing with these issues you raise…

-Ben