> Does anyone feel that putting the tolerance and maxits with
> LinearImplicitSystem and not EquationSystems would be better?

Yes.  The ability to set independent tolerances in different systems
is why I made member variables for the DiffSolver tolerances.

Would it then make sense to have member variables for LinearSolver too?  Could
be better than for LinearImplicitSystem or EquationSystems? 

So I guess there's no major problems, except that doing such a change
well would be tedious code nobody will want to write.  ;-)  I don't
suppose you want to submit a patch?

The only real problem would be in for example LinearImplicitSystem (others possibly
as well) you would have to refer to parameters from <this> instead of
EquationsSystems.  I don't see it being a difficult change and patch but fixing all of
the examples is most of the work, right? 


Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
Libmesh-users mailing list

Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.