Just to  make a remark about the code itself, I indeed agree that maintaining code for both gtk2 and gtk3 doesn't improve readability. The way the code has been done is however inspired on how others did it. I don't know if there is a better way to do it.
No problem at all with the delay. I have a full time job, family, ... so I perfectly understand that you also have your priorities.
I was just sending mails to get a status update, not more.
Thanks a lot to you all for the reviews and, should you receive bug reports, don't hesitate to send them to me.
----- Mail original -----
> De : Dan Fandrich <dan@coneharvesters.com>
> À : libexif-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc :
> Envoyé le : Mercredi 25 avril 2012 23h34
> Objet : Re: [Libexif-devel] Changes to libexif-gtk for migration to gtk3
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:46:07PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
>> I would however say its good in the end.
> Thanks for taking a look at this, Marcus. I managed to contact
> Lutz Müller, the original author of libexif-gtk, and he was fine with
> it, too.  Sorry about that unexpectedly-long delay, Valère, and thanks
> for your patience. I'll check it in soon.
>>>> Dan
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> libexif-devel mailing list
> libexif-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libexif-devel