Re: [Kile-devel] Languages for 1.6.1?

[Mikael K. <alc...@al...>]

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:21, Jeroen Wijnhout wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2004 14:42, Thomas Basset wrote:
> > Jeroen is just about to release Kile 1.6.1 which contains mostly bugfixes.
> >
> > He'd like to include some translations in the tarball which is a very
> > good idea. However, he'd like to include only translations that are
> > actively maintained. I disagree with this as I think that some
> > translated strings are better than none.
> >
> > Any comments? Should we include all the translations or only the one
> > that are actively maintained?
> 
> To be clear: A language should not be included, imho, if many strings are 
> untranslated. For example KDE policy for including a language is: 90% of the 
> strings for KDE libs and 75% for KDE base. I would say we should demand 
> around 75% for Kile as well.
> 
> Call me crazy, but to me it seems a bit annoying to have a GUI in two 
> different languages.
> 

Hello!

I agree with Jeroen, I think guis with only partial translation are
quite annoying. =) However, it's only a question of principle to me, as
I run KDE in English anyway.

Thanks,
Mikael