From: Thomas B. <br...@ph...> - 2008-04-13 17:48:24
|
On Sunday 13 April 2008 05:53, Thibaut Cousin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > so that does "no feedback" mean? > > No bugs or no testers? > > I'm a bit slow about testing at the moment, as I'm on holidays. But > I can tell you it compiles fines on Mac OS X (on both PPC and Intel) > and I'm going to start real work on it, probably tomorrow. I'll keep > you informed if I get into any bug. > Apart from the code completion problem, anything I should > specifically test? Hi Thibaut, actually not. I just looked at the Changelog and the rest is straight forward I suppose. But I must say I just submitted a different codecompletion fix to the repository. My previous solution from https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155044#c9 created https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160555 and this is also a nasty one. So I reverted the hole thing and took a different approach. Now it would be interesting which codecompletion fix works better: - 2.0rc1 from http://kile.sourceforge.net/download.php - revision 796505 from the kile 2.0 branch, get it with svn co svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/branches/extragear/kde3/office Thanks for your help, Thomas |