From: Thomas B. <br...@ph...> - 2007-02-26 00:26:42
|
Hello, since ages we have the command \Input{...} in our list of possible include commands together with \input{...} and \include{...}. Because I'm currently making this static list configurable I wonder if this command is really a standard latex command. Because without additional packages latex doesn't like it ... Thanks, Thomas |
From: JSW <sp...@wi...> - 2007-02-26 18:34:17
|
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 01:26 +0100, Thomas Braun wrote: > Hello, > > since ages we have the command \Input{...} in our list of possible include > commands together with \input{...} and \include{...}. > > Because I'm currently making this static list configurable I wonder if this > command is really a standard latex command. > Because without additional packages latex doesn't like it ... It's not a standard command, but the Input package is included in the teTeX distribution, probably also in other distributions. It is widely used, so if it doesn't hurt to keep, I would suggest to keep it. best, Jeroen |
From: Thomas B. <br...@ph...> - 2007-02-26 21:28:18
|
On Monday 26 February 2007 19:33, JSW wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 01:26 +0100, Thomas Braun wrote: > > Hello, > > > > since ages we have the command \Input{...} in our list of possible > > include commands together with \input{...} and \include{...}. > > > > Because I'm currently making this static list configurable I wonder if > > this command is really a standard latex command. > > Because without additional packages latex doesn't like it ... > > It's not a standard command, but the Input package is included in the > teTeX distribution, probably also in other distributions. It is widely > used, so if it doesn't hurt to keep, I would suggest to keep it. > > best, > Jeroen Hi Jeroen, of course it does not hurt :) Although I don't find the package on my system and on ctan I will add it. Thomas |