From: Samuele P. <pe...@in...> - 2000-10-26 13:59:52
|
Hi. [Finn] > >I clarified to myself that jythonc should build the list, use the new > >order dealing with imports but it is not necessary that it find out > >that a py pkg is also a java pkg :). The modified runtime support > >can deal with this. > > I can make this change. Py.initProxy will then get a new "String[] > modules" argument. I'll make it a patch,, i.e I will not commit this > until we have settled the complete semantic change. [me] > During the next weekend I will somehow start experimenting with > merging PyJava*Packages and sys.path java load support. > So we will have some experience about this. Given the flat sematic for sys.path java loading (no dynamic __path__'s) there is nothing to experiment with, fixing things to the new semantic should be simple (and make code cleaner), up to jpythonc building the list (but I think it already gathers that information) and how radically can we change PackageManager, but I don't think its interface was intended to be public up to the sys.add_package door that will still be there. It is really just Barry turn to express his opinions and concerns. regards, Samuele. |