From: Frank W. <fwi...@gm...> - 2007-04-29 21:30:54
|
On 4/29/07, Frank Wierzbicki <fwi...@gm...> wrote: > On 4/29/07, Samuele Pedroni <ped...@op...> wrote: > > if we already do that, using a new classloader for each generated class. > > That's the purpose of > > the various BytecodeLoader classes. While we are talking about custom classloaders, what do you think will be involved for us to modify the existing codebase to allow for environments where we cannot use custom classloaders (for example, unsigned applets)? This is an important use case (at least for some) that we should consider for the jythonc/regular jython unification. -Frank |