From: Michel P. <mi...@di...> - 2003-12-15 20:53:15
|
> IMHO, lack of non-blocking IO support in Jython > is one of the reasons > why we don't see more cross-fertilisation > between Cpython and jython. I agree. > I've looked into coding the requisite > non-blocking I/O support for > Jython: it shouldn't be too hard. However, it > does require modification > of a number of Jython library modules, including > those dealing with > sockets, pipes, etc. would any of the existing modules need changing? Maybe I'm not clear, but I'm able to use NIO Java classes no problem with Jython. > > I hope to make some time to develop asynchronous > processing support in > the coming weeks. Unfortunately though, paying > work has to come first > for me right now. > > Alan. I know how that is, like Brian Z I too have beek working in the pastwith the NIO stuff and it's exciting. I put together a small asyncore "clone" written in pure Java (I called it NoBlock as "asyncronous" seemed like a misnomer to me). If you guys want to to look at it, I'll send it your way. -Michel |