On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Frank Wierzbicki <fwierzbicki@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Tobias Ivarsson <thobes@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are Google willing to sign a contributors agreement and license this patch
> to us? otherwise someone who has not looked on it yet (i.e. not me), should
> probably experiment with Jython on GAE and find out what needs to be patched
> to get Jython to run there.
Google is a member of the PSF, so as long as Google wants this
contributed I think it's okay.  To be safe we should get an explicit
statement, but since the patch is small, this probably isn't strictly
necessary.  FWIW this is how my on-the-clock contributions to Jython
are protected (Sun is a member of the PSF and allows my
contributions).

I submitted 1188 and I'm a Google employee working on company time.  Let me know if anything further is needed, but we have quite a few contributors to the Python project working here.

- James
 

-Frank

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
Jython-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev