From: Stefan S. <ss...@ge...> - 2012-01-22 18:52:17
|
Mhm.. yeah.. using "merge" is an option. I chose "Intersect" as it is the technical (JTS) operation. But in terms of understanding - "merge" is better. stefan Am 22.01.12 11:16, schrieb edg...@we...: > On 22.01.2012 19:02, Stefan Steiniger wrote: >> Hi, >> >> There have been some changes in the naming of analysis function (for OJ >> 1.5/1.5.1) that I don't like that much - speaking here only of the >> English version. My German version is fine. >> >> a) "Overlay Polygon Layers": >> not very descriptive naming - more descriptive was its old name of OJ >> 1.4.1: "Intersect Polygon Layers" (unfortunately, ArcGIS calls it "union") > > sounds like "Merge Polygon Layers" would be fitting, no clue what the function does just interpreting the arcgis description > > ..ede > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Try before you buy = See our experts in action! > The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers > is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel |