From: Christian Naß <noseman@no...> - 2005-01-10 13:34:13
Am Montag, 10 Januar 2005 schrieb "David Roussel" <jsch@...
>I found jsch difficult to get started with, but there are enough
>examples, so it's not impossible.
>I think Jsch is a very good thing to have. I think it could be better,
>and so it falls on us users to help improve it. After all, we've
That is right, but I would prefer to be the "documentation" thing to be
at a high priority... ;-)
At least some kind of javadoc would be veeeeery nice to have...
+-From: Christian Na,A_(B <noseman@...> --
|_Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:34:07 GMT _______
|That is right, but I would prefer to be the "documentation" thing
|to be at a high priority... ;-) At least some kind of javadoc
|would be veeeeery nice to have...
I strongly agree with you. I think there will not be so radical
changes for APIs for a while, so it must be good time to have docs.
Of course, your contributions are welcome.
You know that Apache Ant has documents on Wiki.
How about using Wiki for writing docs for JSch?