From: A. H. <ang...@ua...> - 2011-01-29 17:04:06
|
On 28 Jan 2011 at 21:20, Jonathan Gutow wrote: > > c. Set Mac/Firefox to do the same as other Firefoxes (Anyone knows of any problems with > > Mac/Firefox that make the applet tag more adequate than the object tag?) > Just tested this. Your version 2 page does not work with FF 3.6+ & MacOS 10.6. No Jmol appears in the first box. Apparently, MacOS FF does do something different. I will also test some of the other combinations this weekend. Actually, this makes little sense. Box #1 is generated by Jmol.js; in page v.2, this is either an applet tag or a revised object tag, both of which are tested in boxes #2 and #3 which apparetly display ok So I'm inclined to think that Jonathan's test failed on #1 was coincidental. Otherwise, it's some failure in my Jmol_new.js I have move forward to a more extensive redesign of Jmol.js and that is now set as page v.3 http://biomodel.uah.es/angel/Jmol/test/test-object-tags-3.htm where Jmol.js will insert the revised object tag for almost any browser (change applies to Mac/Firefox, Mac/Opera) I have tested this v.3 on Macs using an online service at browsercam.com (yes, they run Java on their browsers!) and all display fine in Mac 10.4 or 10.5, Firefox, Safari or Opera So I think I'm going ahead with these changes to be put into the next releases of 12.0 and 12.1 I am also doing some review of the Browser Check page at the Jmol website, along similar lines and also to include better identification of browsers. Real browser reports are still welcome! |