Re: [Jmol-users] proposed change to Jmol.js

[Robert H. <ha...@st...>]

OK. Others have comments on this?

Bob


On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Rolf Huehne <rh...@fl...> wrote:

> Robert Hanson wrote:
> > One more thought on this: What about an option that allows the
> replacement
> > of the Jar file but first prompts the user for an OK (using JavaScript
> > prompt() ) and explains why this might be an issue? If the user says it
> is
> > OK, then the Jar file is used?
> >
>
> Accepting should not be the default and then I think it should be ok.
>
> If it is integrated the possible consequences should be pointed out
> clearly in the documentation of 'Jmol.js'. And it should be easily
> removable by people who don't like to take the risk.
>
> Regards,
> Rolf
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
> challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
> prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>



-- 
Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900