Bob,
I feel like cherry picking functionality to include would present difficulties to users; e.g. "I thought JSmol could do x, but it can't!"

This is a wild idea, but could the entire command-running apparatus be decoupled from display and mouse actions, with significant savings in code size? I'm imagining something like a kiosk mode, without the machinery of scripting behind it.

I understand this may not be possible; just wanted to throw it out there.

On Wednesday, January 30, 2013, Robert Hanson wrote:
I'm wondering if we should try to produce a really trimmed-down "lite" version of Jmol -- a very very minimal core set of functionality that could have better load performance on mobile devices for very basic tasks.

Maybe just

wireframe
spacefill
balls&sticks
no text
no math (just simple "Rasmol-like" script commands)
just XYZ/MOL file reading

(basically a ChemDoodle-HTML5-only-like level of capability)

What would be a reasonable goal for code size?

Suggestions?

(I think I could make it to automatically load additional functionality as needed.)

Bob


--
Robert M. Hanson
Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry
Chair, Chemistry Department
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900



--

---
Michael Evans
Organic Chemistry Graduate Student, Moore Group
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign