Oh, I know what you mean. You have to set the cutoff differently for different orbitals. This is an absolute cutoff, not a percent. So the default cutoff of 0.14 is simply a starting point.

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:30 AM, rspinney <rspinney@chemistry.ohio-state.edu> wrote:

Larger the effective charge in the nucleus, the smaller the atomic orbital.

Correct. The radial extent of the orbital should increase as n increases.
This is working correctly for the default Zeff=6 (i.e. using isosurface
phase atomicOrbital 1 0 0). When I tried for a hydrogen orbital (Zeff=1) the
2s is larger than the 1s as except, but the 3s, 4s ... are all smaller than
the 1s and getting smaller as n increases.


On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:50 PM, rspinney <
rspinney@chemistry.ohio-state.edu> wrote:

>  According to the documentation the command ?isosurface phase
> atomicOrbital 1 0 0 1 translucent 0.6;? should generate the 1s orbital for
> hydrogen, the fourth number behind atomicOrbital being the Zeff. I am
> getting very strange results for n>= 3. These orbitals are smaller then
> n=1 or n=2. I have tried this in 12.0.25 and 12.1.26 with the same
> Any ideas on what may be wrong?
> Thanks, Rick

Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers
to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and,
should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database
without downtime or disruption
Jmol-users mailing list

Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave.
Northfield, MN 55057
phone: 507-786-3107

If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900