On 04/22/2011 04:57 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
On 04/22/2011 02:55 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
It didn't appear to be fixed on my machine so I am guessing the same
will be for you but definitely curious to here what happens.

Are you sure you tested the patch?  The fsck output indicates that fsck.jfs was built on March 4, but I sent the patch on March 7.

Pretty darn sure. That date is *not* the compile date but instead just the date that is listed in the source:

./include/jfs_version.h:#define JFSUTILS_DATE "04-Mar-2011"

I verified my source had the patch and my binary modification time shows 1 minute after the edit time of the file from the patch:

root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15# ls -lsah ./libfs/log_map.c
60K -rw-r--r-- 1 root 1000 57K 2011-03-16 07:50 ./libfs/log_map.c
root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15# ls -lsah /sbin/fsck.jfs
1000K -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 996K 2011-03-16 07:51 /sbin/fsck.jfs
root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15#

so I would have to say yes, I am about 98% sure that I did have the patch applied properly.