Re: [ jEdit-devel ] Xml parser: why com.microstart.xml?

[David W. <df...@co...>]

> > in short, it would be OK to just package crimson.jar and jaxp.jar, but i
> > think that coming up with a general XML strategy, as you have suggested,
> > is quite advisable at this point.

More grist for the mill:

http://xml.apache.org/~andyc/xerces2/

Looks like the people at xml-apache share our concerns with Xerces' size, but
aren't very happy with Crimson either.  They seem to be rewriting Xerces, but
haven't released anything new yet.

Dave