From: Scott M S. <sco...@jb...> - 2006-04-03 22:15:09
|
Yes, we should be defaulting to a single node, unclustered jboss cache rather than having to supply yet another thirdparty jar to handle the baseline cache.=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: jbo...@li...=20 > [mailto:jbo...@li...] On=20 > Behalf Of Scott Marlow > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 2:05 PM > To: jbo...@li... > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Unassigned for 4.0.4 >=20 > Does anyone reading this understand how "JBAS-2868 Missing=20 > jar ehcache-1.1.jar for Hibernate support" should be fixed? >=20 > It is only of the few unassigned issues left. I'm wondering=20 > if Hibernate could use JBossCache for the level one cache=20 > instead of ehCache (easy hibernate cache). This might be a=20 > nice alternative to adding the ehCache jar to the 4.0.4 as release. >=20 |