[Javagroups-development] Re: JGroups versus JMS
Brought to you by:
belaban
From: Bela B. <be...@jb...> - 2006-01-24 15:56:53
|
The main diff is that JMS does not need to be reliable. Note that JBoss Messaging will provide a JMS interface to JGroups, so JGroups is IMO lower in the stack than JMS. Jan Verheul wrote: > > Hello Bela, > > > > I am a developer from Holland. Currently I am considering using > JGroups for > > an extensive project I am working on. I have read the documentation on > > JGroups on the web and I am impressed by what JGroups has to offer. I > have > > one question however. I wonder how JGroups relates to JMS. It seems to me > > that with JMS, topics, and durable subscriptions, you can do about the > same > > as what you can do with JGroups. Or am I wrong? > > > > What it the specific benefit of using JGroups over JMS? Can you please > > comment on differences and similarities between JGroups and JMS? > > > > Thanks a lot in advance, > > > > Dr. J.C. Verheul, Ede, Holland. > > > > > -- Bela Ban Lead JGroups / JBossCache callto://belaban |