Re: [irda-users] Re: discovery hang with WinCE device

[Jean T. <jt...@bo...>]

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 11:11:18PM -0400, Kyle Harris wrote:
> 
> On Tuesday 24 September 2002 09:30 pm, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> 
> > Kyle Harris wrote :
> > >  04:20:58.410180 xid:cmd bd8f0992 > ffffffff S=6 s=* 192 hint=8404
> > >  04:20:58.785485 snrm:cmd ca=fe pf=1 b9fc8ec7 < 00000395 new-ca=88
> >
> > 	Congratulation, you have found a bug in WinCE !
> > 		o The Linux computer is 'bd8f0992'.
> > 		o The WinCE PDA is '00000395'.
> > 		o But, who is 'b9fc8ec7' ?
> > 	Who does WinCE think it want to talk to ? And why 'b9fc8ec7'
> > doesn't answer ? So many questions...
> 
> I love finding bugs in Windoze :) I got another dump of the entire thing and 
> the bogus id comes from the previous connection (connect, disconnect, 
> reconnect). It only happens occasionally. Is there any chance irdadump missed 
> something?

	What do you mean ? irdadump report every frame *successfully*
received. Do an irdadump -x or irdadump -b to get the raw data and
verify things for yourself.
	Note that I'm interested in the full log and check if Linux
really changed its IrDA address as you seem to imply (this should
happen only if you reload the IrDA driver).

> Thanks, Kyle.

	Jean