#795 [Ipcop 2.0] Port forwarding using port

2.0
closed-works-for-me
nobody
General (237)
5
2014-02-14
2011-11-14
yoan guillot
No

Hello,
When i try to define a port and check the checkbox "used port" in source destination, the rule is created but it doesn't work.
Without this checkbox checked it work but i can't define mutiple ports (multi - pc) for a service like RDP(3389).

Exemple :

PC1 RDP TCP Any:3390 => 3389
PC2 RDP TCP Any:3389 => 3389

Only "PC1 RDP TCP Any => 3390" works...

Thanks

Discussion

  • yoan guillot
    yoan guillot
    2011-11-14

    • summary: Port forwarding using port --> [Ipcop 2.0] Port forwarding using port
     
  • Olaf Westrik
    Olaf Westrik
    2011-11-14

    • status: open --> pending-works-for-me
     
  • Olaf Westrik
    Olaf Westrik
    2011-11-14

    Check the firewall log to find out which mistake you have made when defining the rule.

     
  • Olaf Westrik
    Olaf Westrik
    2012-03-04

    • status: pending-works-for-me --> closed-works-for-me