My personal prejudice is that a label might be misleading,
because any single line on the graph can correspond to many
hosts over the life of the graph. In particular, the first
busiest host line gives the amount of traffic for the top
host each 30 minutes, but the identity of that host can
change every 30 minutes.
Of coures, if there's a consensus we could label the graph
with the
most *recent* top 5 hosts - those of the last 30 minutes.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
My personal prejudice is that a label might be misleading,
because any single line on the graph can correspond to many
hosts over the life of the graph. In particular, the first
busiest host line gives the amount of traffic for the top
host each 30 minutes, but the identity of that host can
change every 30 minutes.
Of coures, if there's a consensus we could label the graph
with the
most *recent* top 5 hosts - those of the last 30 minutes.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6295
My personal prejudice is that a label might be misleading,
because any single line on the graph can correspond to many
hosts over the life of the graph. In particular, the first
busiest host line gives the amount of traffic for the top
host each 30 minutes, but the identity of that host can
change every 30 minutes.
Of coures, if there's a consensus we could label the graph
with the
most *recent* top 5 hosts - those of the last 30 minutes.
Logged In: YES
user_id=6295
My personal prejudice is that a label might be misleading,
because any single line on the graph can correspond to many
hosts over the life of the graph. In particular, the first
busiest host line gives the amount of traffic for the top
host each 30 minutes, but the identity of that host can
change every 30 minutes.
Of coures, if there's a consensus we could label the graph
with the
most *recent* top 5 hosts - those of the last 30 minutes.