On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:04 AM, helix84 <helix84@centrum.sk> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 21:22, Yaron Shahrabani <sh.yaron@gmail.com> wrote:
> helix84 according to your latest experience with Transifex, do you think
> this method is more practical to Inkscape's need?

I haven't actually had a chance to test it because my translations of
LXDE are 100% complete :)
I had to complete PCManFM - Apparently there were some missing strings I wasn't aware of
There are 2 options there - the first one is to edit the translation using Transifex and the second is to upload a file from your computer
Take a look around, I bet you'll like it and as far as I see this system works directly on the git repo

Anyway, I'm not the right person to ask because I personally prefer
the .po + VCS approach and I find the advantages of web interfaces
minor in comparison to inferior work speed. So I don't mind any extra
interface as long as .po + VCS still works.

Regards
~~helix84

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-translator mailing list
Inkscape-translator@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-translator