On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:13, Lucas Vieites <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:If I understand it correctly, you don't want to translate Inkscape GUI
> just to clarify my position: I don't pretend to substitute the currently
> used gettext .po files that are used for the GUI, but only the Wiki pages
using Translatewiki, you want to translate Inkscape website wiki pages
using Translatewiki. I don't think that's reasonable - Translate wiki
is string-based, not page-based, so it will not make this job easier.
I originally understood you want to enable current .po files to be
translated via Translatewiki (as Yuri said, they do .po
import/export), that would be reasonable.
> In the same way that I don't agreeHere I don't agree with you - the task is automated. And import/export
> with the decision that was taken to convert the tutorials to .po files for
> translation, and then converting them back again to svg format, I would not
> find it "logical" to convert the wiki texts to .po and then back again. I
> think that that would be a waste of effort if there already is an easier way
> to automate the task.
of translations to some web translation platform would also be
automated, .po files wouldn't disappear, only translators would not
work with them directly.
> I don't have any experience using translatewiki (yet), so I don't know ifI think this is highly subjective - which one each translator prefers.
> it really would be an easier way to keep inkscape's wiki translations up to
> date. Could you shed some light here?
Recently there was such transition going on in LXDE and they were
deciding between Transifex and Pootle (Translatewiki was probably also
mentioned) and every translator had his say in that. You can look it
up in the archives.
But like I said, this is not for wiki pages.