From: Hal B. <ha...@bu...> - 2002-08-30 12:55:10
|
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 03:22:23PM +0200, Andreas Oesterhelt wrote: > > > What is the roadmap for 3.0 branch? Are going: > > 3.0.x (stable): 3.0.0 (stable), next release 3.0.1 (stable) > 3.1.x (devel) : 3.0.1 (CVS-only), 3.0.2 (public, alpha), ... > 3.2.x (stable)... > > > CVS is still 3.0.0 (stable), which is almost true (a few small > > commits). > > Ahh -- please don't! We had once decided not to commit changes > incrementally to the stable branches (idea: no development anymore, > just punctual bugfixes). Hmmm....OK, but I certainly don't remember this discussion (not doubting you though). > If a particular fix doesn't justify releasing a new version, then > draw a patch against the current stable version, and post it > on the patches tracker as "3.0.0 -> 3.0.1". Whoever needs > to add to that can do, and when a new release is justified, > the patch will be applied in one go, and 3.0.1 (oddl, but stable!!) > will be released. OK. Docs too? I added David Mediavilla in 'testers' section. And small 'stable' section to p-announce.sgml (probably no one uses except me). > If in doubt, consult the excellent documantation ;-)) RTFM :) David Schmidt, we probably need to keep accurate ChangeLog since it is only fixes going in :) Please help (me|us) remember things. -- Hal Burgiss |