I don't know if you're interested in this snippet from the london.pm
----- Forwarded message from Dave Cross -----
Subject: Re: webmail
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 06:39:15 +0000
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:58:07AM +0000, Chisel Wright (chisel@...) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 09:32:19AM +0000, Dave Cross wrote:
> > Depends what you're doing I guess. At least half of what I do with
> > templates has nothing at all to do with generating HTML so it makes
> > no sense to use a templating system that is tied to producing HTML.
> I guess the name is misleading.
> I've used H::T for templating in general.
> I guess HTML was what it was originally intended to template, but it's
> not tied to it.
Module naming is very important. I wonder how many other people have
been put off using HTML::Template because they aren't building HTML
with their templates?
Perhaps you could suggest a name change to the author. Maybe something
Drugs are just bad m'kay
----- End forwarded message -----
e: chisel@... | Hey, this is my sig, if you don't like
w: http://www.herlpacker.co.uk | it, STOP READING MY EMAILS!
gpg: D167E7FE |