From: Art B. <ac...@in...> - 2014-03-07 00:50:31
|
On Mar 6, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Tony Langdon <vk...@gm...> wrote: > I should have said a single user system was my original vision (as > documented online late last year). :) Tony, I have no desire to vandalize your vision... but I didn't realize we were building this just for you! So what do you need, exactly? > I see where this came from. My suggestion was that clients could have > the ability to temporarily lock other connected clients out of changing > radio settings, so they could perform critical operations (e.g. > satellite antenna and Doppler tracking) without being interrupted by > stray requests from another client. Guess I'm not clear on why multiple clients would be interfering in a single-user system. Is it possible we're really talking about a process priority issue? - Art KD6O |