Re: [Gumstix-users] serial_pxa_get_mctrl

[Craig H. <cr...@hu...>]

I'll be checking something into to SVN soon to give everyone else a 
chance to bang on this new code.  I'll also stick a quick test root_fs 
on my server to let people quickly test w/out having to rebuild...

C

On Feb 22, 2005, at 6:42 AM, David Farrell wrote:

> Robert,
>
> Benny also asked I send him the patch. It is not
> that I don't want to share at this point but I
> really want Craig to manage this.  Although my
> testing has shown good results, Craigs test still
> indicates a problem.  I am a novice at kernel
> development, I am sure Craig had to massage the
> patch I sent him to get it right. I don't want to
> set anyone back do to patch problems when the
> task at hand is bluetooth testing.  At any rate
> if Craigs schedule can permit him to work this
> out in the next couple of days, I'll send you and
> Benny the patch off list.
> David.
>
>
> --- Bouwens / Mehl <Bou...@bl...>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> is it possible to receive your patched root
>> file system?
>> I'm having a 400 MHz gum from the 2nd
>> production run.
>>
>> Just for testing if it fails, then...
>> But when it works, that would be wonderfull.
>>
>> Regards
>> Robert
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Farrell" <dav...@ya...>
>> To: <gum...@li...>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 2:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users]
>> serial_pxa_get_mctrl
>>
>>
>>> We must have diffent boards. Via a ssh
>> session to
>>> the gumstix I am pinging out the gumstix to
>> my
>>> router.  Simultaneously I am pinging the
>> gumstix
>>> from my Fedora. All pings are using -s 1024.
>>> Overnight I saw 80MB of characters both ways
>>> without error. It is still running, when I
>> get
>>> home tonight I'll check it again.  Other than
>>> this, what do you mean by high bandwidth? The
>>> burst rate can't be any higher since I am
>> always
>>> sending more data than FIFO or buffer size.
>> The
>>> average rate may be low due to ping
>> behaviour.
>>>
>>> Tell me what you are doing to test it? I'll
>> try
>>> the same.  What fails?
>>>
>>>
>>> --- Craig Hughes <cr...@hu...>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just tested your patched driver on BTUART at
>>>> 921600, and it breaks as
>>>> soon as I try to send data from gumstix to
>>>> outside world at high
>>>> bandwidth.  Looks just like what would
>> happen
>>>> pre-patch.
>>>>
>>>> So sounds like this patch fixes what you
>> were
>>>> seeing with the HWUART on
>>>> your gumstix, but doesn't resolve the BTUART
>>>> issue(s).
>>>>
>>>> C
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product
>> Guide
>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of
>> IT Products from real users.
>>> Discover which products truly live up to the
>> hype. Start reading now.
>>>
>>
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>> gumstix-users mailing list
>>> gum...@li...
>>>
>>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
>>
>>
>>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT
>> Products from real users.
>> Discover which products truly live up to the
>> hype. Start reading now.
>>
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> gumstix-users mailing list
>> gum...@li...
>>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
>>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real 
> users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gum...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users