Re: [Gumstix-users] Chestnut and battery operation

[ekrem <eha...@ho...>]

this very important subject

chestnut43 is not compatible batt (I am using 3.6 to 5v 1amp dc/dc
converter)
palo 43 is compatible 3.6v batt application

but gumstix is not say these clearly  why ?



David Vescovi-2 wrote:
> 
> It appears the Chestnut board would not be a very good choice for a
> battery 
> powered device. The USB host VBUS only contains a switch off the VBAT
> (power) 
> input. If anything other then a regulated 5v is used to supply (like a 
> battery) the USB host VBUS will not be correct. This is different then the 
> Palo board which does have a 5v boost regulator from VBAT. The Palo
> appears to 
> be the better choise for a true battery powered device.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gum...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Chestnut-and-battery-operation-tp28047929p28066579.html
Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.