From: David I S M. <da...@th...> - 2005-05-11 21:59:02
|
I vote for more mounting holes and a dual CF. On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 12:48 -0700, Gordon Kruberg wrote: > How about if we come out with an MMC Etherstix board with a hole for the > bluetooth antenna, and also come out with a connex board that has a > bluetooth module on it? > > While we're at it, how about an additional mounting hole on the connex > board? > > Gordon > > > > Craig > > > >>> mechanical limitation, or is it a technical limitation of the > >>> platform? > >> > >> > >> We are working on a connex-based ether/MMC combo card to solve this > >> need. > > > > > > Hmm. any chance you might add the 20-pin (hirose?) connection that > > mates with socketcom's bluetooth module so we don't have to give up > > bluetooth? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > -- David Mandala <davidm at them dot com> www.them.com/~davidm Public Key id: 45B2D952 Murphy TX, 75094 214.774.2569 HO 972.693.4007 C |