From: <dpe...@si...> - 2003-07-11 16:40:36
|
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Tim Waugh had this to say: >On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:36:28AM -0700, dpe...@si... wrote: > >> Also, in the detailed descendant report every person. living or dead, is >> referred to in the past tense. This reads awkwardly. A naive fix would >> be to only use past tense if a death date exists for the person. >> However, that is still imperfect because one may not know the death >> date---especially for far-removed generations. > >This is what Person.probablyAlive() is for. Although it could be made Ahhh. I have not dived into the details of the reports yet. I just noticed this in reading them. Good idea. >> Also, if the person is living, but parents are deceased, then using >> the past tense in terms of "Joe was the son of John and Betty" may >> still be appropriate. Any ideas? > >Just MHO, but I think the tense should agree with the state of 'Joe' >in that sentence. I think I agree with you. I _did_ use the qualifier "may", after all. :-) In any case, as Alex said, we are in string freeze now so we won't touch it until the new release is made. Cheers, -Don ________________________________________________ Donald A. Peterson | dpe...@si... Ph.D. Research Associate | Dept. of Chemistry | PH: (541) 737-7079 Oregon St. University | FAX: (541) 737-0480 ------------------------------------------------ |