You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(35) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(96) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(70) |
Dec
(61) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(126) |
Feb
(31) |
Mar
(64) |
Apr
(84) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(56) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(31) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(60) |
Dec
(34) |
2003 |
Jan
(30) |
Feb
(61) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(30) |
May
(78) |
Jun
(55) |
Jul
(111) |
Aug
(108) |
Sep
(104) |
Oct
(98) |
Nov
(92) |
Dec
(73) |
2004 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(70) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(118) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(71) |
Aug
(251) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(155) |
Nov
(74) |
Dec
(57) |
2005 |
Jan
(183) |
Feb
(94) |
Mar
(170) |
Apr
(242) |
May
(233) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(69) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(99) |
Oct
(60) |
Nov
(65) |
Dec
(210) |
2006 |
Jan
(169) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(179) |
May
(142) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(98) |
Sep
(110) |
Oct
(189) |
Nov
(262) |
Dec
(207) |
2007 |
Jan
(376) |
Feb
(255) |
Mar
(168) |
Apr
(174) |
May
(167) |
Jun
(192) |
Jul
(197) |
Aug
(171) |
Sep
(307) |
Oct
(572) |
Nov
(454) |
Dec
(471) |
2008 |
Jan
(707) |
Feb
(365) |
Mar
(464) |
Apr
(410) |
May
(251) |
Jun
(142) |
Jul
(112) |
Aug
(143) |
Sep
(94) |
Oct
(280) |
Nov
(337) |
Dec
(232) |
2009 |
Jan
(508) |
Feb
(491) |
Mar
(363) |
Apr
(280) |
May
(186) |
Jun
(250) |
Jul
(231) |
Aug
(487) |
Sep
(189) |
Oct
(344) |
Nov
(456) |
Dec
(439) |
2010 |
Jan
(514) |
Feb
(725) |
Mar
(591) |
Apr
(256) |
May
(209) |
Jun
(75) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(248) |
Sep
(230) |
Oct
(393) |
Nov
(368) |
Dec
(276) |
2011 |
Jan
(457) |
Feb
(308) |
Mar
(358) |
Apr
(277) |
May
(333) |
Jun
(320) |
Jul
(198) |
Aug
(186) |
Sep
(87) |
Oct
(238) |
Nov
(123) |
Dec
(129) |
2012 |
Jan
(127) |
Feb
(182) |
Mar
(208) |
Apr
(134) |
May
(230) |
Jun
(138) |
Jul
(126) |
Aug
(176) |
Sep
(231) |
Oct
(235) |
Nov
(164) |
Dec
(219) |
2013 |
Jan
(316) |
Feb
(371) |
Mar
(393) |
Apr
(165) |
May
(321) |
Jun
(301) |
Jul
(124) |
Aug
(183) |
Sep
(191) |
Oct
(285) |
Nov
(172) |
Dec
(196) |
2014 |
Jan
(392) |
Feb
(284) |
Mar
(134) |
Apr
(206) |
May
(123) |
Jun
(115) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(157) |
Sep
(122) |
Oct
(124) |
Nov
(63) |
Dec
(56) |
2015 |
Jan
(249) |
Feb
(335) |
Mar
(277) |
Apr
(98) |
May
(274) |
Jun
(214) |
Jul
(142) |
Aug
(240) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(77) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(171) |
2016 |
Jan
(217) |
Feb
(167) |
Mar
(62) |
Apr
(180) |
May
(270) |
Jun
(86) |
Jul
(112) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(91) |
Nov
(62) |
Dec
(101) |
2017 |
Jan
(116) |
Feb
(115) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(123) |
Jul
(65) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(103) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(7) |
2018 |
Jan
(27) |
Feb
(64) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(72) |
May
(49) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(39) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(45) |
2019 |
Jan
(35) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(28) |
Apr
(38) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(41) |
Jul
|
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(41) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(32) |
2020 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(29) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(5) |
2021 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(64) |
Jul
(96) |
Aug
(71) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(5) |
2022 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(10) |
2023 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(34) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(10) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(7) |
2024 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(23) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(17) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Julio S. <jul...@gm...> - 2005-08-21 19:56:39
|
2005/8/16, Don Allingham <dal...@us...>: > Now that 2.0.6 is out, I would ask that people attempt to use the > Narrative Web Page generator. 2.0.6 is the first release to include > this, and we want to shake out the bugs. Once we feel confident about > this, we will release 2.0.7 with all the fixes. The alive filter does not work for people recently born. The check is for someone alive some N years ago. Unfortunately, people born after that are marked as not alive at that date and, thus, get leaked. Any fix I can think of is rather intrusive. Julio |
From: Tim A. <ti...@pr...> - 2005-08-21 10:45:46
|
Attached is a patch which addresses a couple of my whinges the other day about the comprehensive ancestors report. I think that making trivial changes to reports is as good a way as any to introduce oneself to the source code base. The changes are: - iff the option to start generations on a new page is selected, the sources list will also start on a new page - for people without photos, we leave the photo box completely blank, no text, no ugly black rectangles I expect the first to be a no-brainer, but perhaps the second may invite debate, since the initial author of this report (was it Tim Waugh?) presumably thought that ugly black rectangles all over the report was a feature, not a bug. Ugliness is in the eye of the beholder, so I'm quite willing to discuss the subject and possibly modify my patch if required. I've done all my testing of the changes with the pdf output option - please let me know if the other options have other subtleties that I've overlooked. Tim |
From: Eero T. <eer...@ne...> - 2005-08-18 18:55:46
|
Hi, On Monday 08 August 2005 19:03, Alex Roitman wrote: > Again, we decided to do it for all reports, but after 2.0.6. The new > progress bar interface is simple, see Utils.ProgressMeter() class for > details. Also see e.g. src/plugins/Check.py for the example use. > > > The typical use is this: > ----------------------------------------------------- > import Utils # already done in all reports, I think > > progress = Utils.ProgressMeter(_('Overall title'),_('Pass title')='') > > progress.set_pass(_('First pass title'),number_of_total_steps) > progress.step() > > progress.set_pass(_('Second pass title'),number_of_total_steps) > progress.step() > > progress.close() > ----------------------------------------------------- Now that 2.0.6 is released, I've added support for this to the Statistics chart. Additionally I made all the barchart texts left aligned in (vain) hope that this would fix the report issues with Gramps font metrics problems, and included the number of persons to each legend item in hope that this clarifies the meaning the charts. I made also several changes to it which require localization changes: - Added the progress meter titles - Added title option for the ReportUtils.draw_legend() and used it with the Statistic Charts - Changed all the StatisticsChart chart type names to singular form (and changed the chart selection tab to say "Charts" instead). This way I could reuse these as legend headings Additionally I added context to "Title" strings in several other files. (This is for Finnish, unfortunately the main problem for this is the glade file containing Edit person dialog where I cannot use localization context. :-/) I haven't updated the template.po yet as I'm assuming that making rest of the reports to use progress indicators will need this too. Bug: There seems to be some problem with Gramps PostScript generation. I get this error from the GhostScript on the Gramps generated PostScript file: ---------- gs ~/statistics_chart.ps ESP Ghostscript 7.07 (2003-07-12) Copyright 2003 artofcode LLC and Easy Software Products, all rights reserved. This software comes with NO WARRANTY: see the file COPYING for details. Error: /undefined in 0,0000 Operand stack: Execution stack: %interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop 1 3 %oparray_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- Dictionary stack: --dict:1057/1417(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:71/200(L)-- Current allocation mode is local Current file position is 612 ESP Ghostscript 7.07.1: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1 ----------- When looking at the file with less, it looks quite normal PS i.e. the file contents are in right format and not (as far as I could see) e.g. truncated. The generated OO and PDF files worked OK in Xpdf and OO, except that there seems to be some problems (again) with OO output, see the attached OO screenshot: - legend and pie outlines are missing - legend texts are position wierdly (My OpenOffice is 1.1.1 version from SUSE 9.1.) - Eero |
From: Don A. <don...@co...> - 2005-08-17 13:17:57
|
If you want, go ahead and remove it from plugins and move the png file. Don On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 13:45 +0100, Richard Taylor wrote: > That makes sense. However, at the moment, in head, it is in src/ and=20 > src/plugins/. Also the scratchpad.png will need moving to src. >=20 > Richard >=20 > On Wednesday 17 Aug 2005 13:11, Don Allingham wrote: > > For 2.1/2.2 I moved it up to src instead of plugins since it is an item > > on the main menu and not really optional. > > > > Don > > > > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 10:51 +0100, Richard Taylor wrote: > > > I am a bit confused. > > > > > > We appear to have the scratchpad in two places: > > > > > > src/ScratchPad.py > > > src/plugins/ScratchPad.py > > > > > > Which one should stay? > > > > > > Richard >=20 --=20 Don Allingham <don...@co...> |
From: Richard T. <rjt...@th...> - 2005-08-17 12:45:34
|
That makes sense. However, at the moment, in head, it is in src/ and src/plugins/. Also the scratchpad.png will need moving to src. Richard On Wednesday 17 Aug 2005 13:11, Don Allingham wrote: > For 2.1/2.2 I moved it up to src instead of plugins since it is an item > on the main menu and not really optional. > > Don > > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 10:51 +0100, Richard Taylor wrote: > > I am a bit confused. > > > > We appear to have the scratchpad in two places: > > > > src/ScratchPad.py > > src/plugins/ScratchPad.py > > > > Which one should stay? > > > > Richard -- You can normally find me on Jabber as Ric...@ja... |
From: Don A. <don...@co...> - 2005-08-17 12:11:43
|
For 2.1/2.2 I moved it up to src instead of plugins since it is an item on the main menu and not really optional.=20 Don On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 10:51 +0100, Richard Taylor wrote: > I am a bit confused. >=20 > We appear to have the scratchpad in two places: >=20 > src/ScratchPad.py > src/plugins/ScratchPad.py >=20 > Which one should stay?=20 >=20 > Richard >=20 --=20 Don Allingham <don...@co...> |
From: Martin H. <Mar...@gm...> - 2005-08-17 10:16:28
|
Hi Richard, you talk about HEAD I guess.. you should better ask Alex about that - he did it about a week ago. His comment was: * src/ScratchPad.py: added But you are right... having two only gives confusion. Cheers, Martin. > Von: Richard Taylor <rjt...@th...> > Betreff: [Gramps-devel] two scratchpads ? > > We appear to have the scratchpad in two places: > > src/ScratchPad.py > src/plugins/ScratchPad.py > > Which one should stay? -- 5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ |
From: Richard T. <rjt...@th...> - 2005-08-17 09:51:30
|
I am a bit confused. We appear to have the scratchpad in two places: src/ScratchPad.py src/plugins/ScratchPad.py Which one should stay? Richard -- You can normally find me on Jabber as Ric...@ja... |
From: Richard T. <rjt...@th...> - 2005-08-17 07:01:08
|
Hi For any Gentoo people out there, here is an ebuild for 2.0.6. It needs placing in your PORTAGE_OVERLAY (read 'man make.conf' for explanation). Richard -- You can normally find me on Jabber as Ric...@ja... |
From: Richard T. <rjt...@th...> - 2005-08-17 06:59:36
|
On Tuesday 16 Aug 2005 20:37, Don Allingham wrote: > Right now gnome-python is a requirement. With 2.2, some of this will go > away. The main window uses gnome.App and the pedigree view and galleries > use gnome.canvas. With GRAMPS 2.1/2.2 we will eliminate this requirement > (at least for the graphical component. We will still us gnome.vfs for > mime type handling). > > We don't need all of GNOME loaded, just whatever pygtk-2.4 and > gnome-python-2.6 require. The GNOME 2.8 can probably be dropped from the > list. From the list below, I have no idea why things like gnome-keyring > or gnome-menus or gnome-desktop are listed as dependencies. And > definitely not GDM or the control center. This must be coming from the > blanket GNOME 2.8 requirement. The main culprit appears to be the gnome-python ebuild. The packager has just included all of the gnome things that gnome-python can support as dependancies. This is a real pain for those not needing them all. I have submited a version of the ebuild that makes most things optional. I have also submited a new ebuild for 2.0.6 but it is taking a long time for them to appear in the portage tree. I will send the 2.0.6 ebuild in a seperate message to the list just in case anyone wants to use it. Richard -- You can normally find me on Jabber as Ric...@ja... |
From: Tim A. <ti...@pr...> - 2005-08-17 01:39:35
|
Richard Taylor wrote: > Tim > > I don't know much about autotools so I asked our local guru :-) > > Below his reply. Not sure that it will help much. > > Richard > > PS. You can run gramps from the source directory with out installing it, which > nicely side steps the need to run automake at all. > > On Tuesday 16 Aug 2005 14:55, you wrote: > >>Richard Taylor wrote: >> >>>From a ML that I am active on.... >>> >>>Is this a automake version problem? >> >>It could be one of two things: >> >> i) the Makefile.am/configure.ac were written for a different >> automake version >> ii) the installed gconf macros were written for a different >> autoCONF version (probably written for 2.13 where OP has >> 2.5x installed). >> >>The integration between automake and the autoconf macro repository >>(/usr/share/aclocal/*.m4) is tighter than most people realise. Filling >>it with macros for various autoconf versions trips automake up before >>autoconf itself has even got started... >> >>HTH, >> Gary. Thanks, Richard and Alex. I had automake versions up to 1.8. I've just upgraded to 1.9.5, deleted aclocal.m4 etc, and now it seems ok. I just completed a build, apparently successfully. A curious thing, however, is that the aclocal.m4 file that was created earlier was demanding version 1.6 of automake, even though I did previously have 1.8 installed. I wondered whether an old aclocal.m4 had been accidentally checked in, but it doesn't look like it. Oh well, it can remain a mystery for now :). Tim -- ----------------------------------------------- Tim Allen ti...@pr... Proximity Pty Ltd http://www.proximity.com.au/ |
From: Eero T. <eer...@ne...> - 2005-08-16 21:18:07
|
Hi, This is with the yesterday's Gramps "2.0.6" CVS version. Bugs: * It seems that the filter radio button "Exactly one rule must apply" doesn't work properly. If I have just one rule (meaning that the radio button selection shouldn't affect the selection), switching from the other options to the "Exactly one rule must apply" will change what is selected. * If I use a filter taking another filter as parameter, for example filters: 1. One person: with rule "People with <ID>" (with some person) 2. His descendents: with rule "Descendants of <filter> match" (with above filter given as parameter) And then try either to test or use 2), I get the following backtrace: ------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/eero/garnome/share/gramps/plugins/FilterEditor.py", line 423, in test_clicked handle_list = filt.apply(self.db,self.db.get_person_handles(sort_handles=False)) File "/home/eero/garnome/share/gramps/GenericFilter.py", line 2015, in apply rule.prepare(db) File "/home/eero/garnome/share/gramps/GenericFilter.py", line 440, in prepare filt = MatchesFilter(self.list) File "/home/eero/garnome/share/gramps/GenericFilter.py", line 96, in __init__ self.set_list(list) File "/home/eero/garnome/share/gramps/GenericFilter.py", line 106, in set_list assert len(list) == len(self.labels), \ AssertionError: Number of arguments does not match number of labels. list: [u'One person', u'1'] labels: ['Filter name:'] -------- Question: What's the difference between system filters and custom filters? Both of these menu items bring up the same user defined filters editor dialog and system filters are not mentioned in the documentation. Btw. the filter names in the documentation on Gramps site don't anymore match the names in Gramps (I think they are the old names without angle brackets). I also noticed that the filter names are a bit misleading. For example filter "Descendant family members of <person>" matches also the <person> and his/her spouse, not just their descendents. - Eero |
From: Eero T. <eer...@ne...> - 2005-08-16 20:03:46
|
Hi, On Tuesday 16 August 2005 22:22, Richard Taylor wrote: > Hi > > I have been hanging out on the Gentoo forums (I know, I should get out > more!). Anyway, there are a number of people that have tried to use > gramps but are put off by the number of dependancies. (It is alright this > is not going to turn into another suggestion for a qt or tk version). > > I think that the problem is partly that the Gentoo ebuild for gramps does > not offer any chance of ignoring any optional dependancies. It also > simply states "gnome" as a dependancy. So I thought that I would have a > go at improving the Gentoo ebuild so that it has options to leave out > anything that is not absolutely required and is a bit more picky about > which bits of gnome are needed. > > So the question now is: what are the required and optional dependancies > for 2.0.6? > > From the readme I have: > Required: > Python 2.3 > Gnome 2.8 > PyGTK2 2.4 > Gnome-python 2.6 > > Optional: > Reportlab (version?) > GraphViz (version?) These are build dependencies, not run-time ones. > Is gnome-python absolutely required? What would be lost with out it? > > How much of gnome is needed? When I tell Gentoo to install gnome I get a > huge number of packages. I can't believe they are all required to run > gramps. > > Here is the list of basic gnome packages that are pulled in: > > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libglade-2.5.1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomeprint-2.10.3 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/orbit-2.12.2 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libbonobo-2.8.1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomecanvas-2.10.0 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gconf-2.10.0 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-mime-data-2.4.2 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.10.1-r1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnome-2.10.0 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libbonoboui-2.8.1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomeprintui-2.10.2 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-keyring-0.4.2 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.10.0 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-menus-2.10.1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.10.1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-panel-2.10.2 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-session-2.10.0-r3 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgtop-2.10.1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gail-1.8.4 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/eel-2.10.1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/librsvg-2.9.5 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/nautilus-2.10.1-r1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/control-center-2.10.1-r1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gdm-2.6.0.9-r3 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.10.1 > [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-2.10.1 You don't need any of the applications, and not even all of the libraries. For building I think it might be enough just to depend from a new enough gnome-python version, I think it should bring in rest of the library dependencies (glade etc.). In my Garnome build I have only bindings/gnome-python as a dependency. For running Gramps you need additionally Gconf and Gnome-vfs daemons installed. > Gentoo's ebuild systems enables fine grained control of dependancies. So > if I could work out which packages were really needed I could cut down on > the pain of gramps installation for non-gnome types. To automatically view the generated reports, Gramps can also run Gnome www-browser, PDF viewer, Abiword and OpenOffice (depending on which report format user selected), if they are installed. - Eero > Any help would be appreciated. > > Regards > > Richard |
From: Don A. <don...@co...> - 2005-08-16 19:38:11
|
Richard Taylor wrote: > From the readme I have: > Required: > Python 2.3 > Gnome 2.8 > PyGTK2 2.4 > Gnome-python 2.6 > > Optional: > Reportlab (version?) > GraphViz (version?) > > Is gnome-python absolutely required? What would be lost with out it? Right now gnome-python is a requirement. With 2.2, some of this will go away. The main window uses gnome.App and the pedigree view and galleries use gnome.canvas. With GRAMPS 2.1/2.2 we will eliminate this requirement (at least for the graphical component. We will still us gnome.vfs for mime type handling). We don't need all of GNOME loaded, just whatever pygtk-2.4 and gnome-python-2.6 require. The GNOME 2.8 can probably be dropped from the list. From the list below, I have no idea why things like gnome-keyring or gnome-menus or gnome-desktop are listed as dependencies. And definitely not GDM or the control center. This must be coming from the blanket GNOME 2.8 requirement. Don |
From: Richard T. <rjt...@th...> - 2005-08-16 19:22:42
|
Hi I have been hanging out on the Gentoo forums (I know, I should get out more= !).=20 Anyway, there are a number of people that have tried to use gramps but are= =20 put off by the number of dependancies. (It is alright this is not going to= =20 turn into another suggestion for a qt or tk version).=20 I think that the problem is partly that the Gentoo ebuild for gramps does n= ot=20 offer any chance of ignoring any optional dependancies. It also simply stat= es=20 "gnome" as a dependancy. So I thought that I would have a go at improving t= he=20 Gentoo ebuild so that it has options to leave out anything that is not=20 absolutely required and is a bit more picky about which bits of gnome are=20 needed. So the question now is: what are the required and optional dependancies for= =20 2.0.6? =46rom the readme I have: Required: Python 2.3 Gnome 2.8 PyGTK2 2.4 Gnome-python 2.6 Optional: Reportlab (version?) GraphViz (version?) Is gnome-python absolutely required? What would be lost with out it? How much of gnome is needed? When I tell Gentoo to install gnome I get a hu= ge=20 number of packages. I can't believe they are all required to run gramps.=20 Here is the list of basic gnome packages that are pulled in: [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libglade-2.5.1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomeprint-2.10.3 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/orbit-2.12.2 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libbonobo-2.8.1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomecanvas-2.10.0 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gconf-2.10.0 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-mime-data-2.4.2 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.10.1-r1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnome-2.10.0 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libbonoboui-2.8.1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomeprintui-2.10.2 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-keyring-0.4.2 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgnomeui-2.10.0 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-menus-2.10.1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.10.1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-panel-2.10.2 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-session-2.10.0-r3 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/libgtop-2.10.1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gail-1.8.4 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/eel-2.10.1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/librsvg-2.9.5 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/nautilus-2.10.1-r1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/control-center-2.10.1-r1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gdm-2.6.0.9-r3 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.10.1 [ebuild N ] gnome-base/gnome-2.10.1 Gentoo's ebuild systems enables fine grained control of dependancies. So if= I=20 could work out which packages were really needed I could cut down on the pa= in=20 of gramps installation for non-gnome types. Any help would be appreciated. Regards Richard =2D-=20 You can normally find me on Jabber as Ric...@ja... |
From: Richard T. <rjt...@th...> - 2005-08-16 19:09:08
|
Tim I don't know much about autotools so I asked our local guru :-) Below his reply. Not sure that it will help much. Richard PS. You can run gramps from the source directory with out installing it, which nicely side steps the need to run automake at all. On Tuesday 16 Aug 2005 14:55, you wrote: > Richard Taylor wrote: > > From a ML that I am active on.... > > > > Is this a automake version problem? > > It could be one of two things: > > i) the Makefile.am/configure.ac were written for a different > automake version > ii) the installed gconf macros were written for a different > autoCONF version (probably written for 2.13 where OP has > 2.5x installed). > > The integration between automake and the autoconf macro repository > (/usr/share/aclocal/*.m4) is tighter than most people realise. Filling > it with macros for various autoconf versions trips automake up before > autoconf itself has even got started... > > HTH, > Gary. On Tuesday 16 Aug 2005 14:38, Tim Allen wrote: > I'm trying to build source I've checked out of the gramps20 branch, but > not getting past square one. > > tim@saraswati gramps2 $ ./autogen.sh --prefix=/home/tim > processing . > Running aclocal ... > Running automake --gnu ... > src/data/Makefile.am:28: GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALLATION was already defined > in condition TRUE, which implies condition GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL_TRUE > PACKAGER_MODE_FALSE > > # Conditionally enable/disable gconf schemas or mime types, > # or disable both in a packager mode > GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALLATION (User, where = src/data/Makefile.am:28) += > { > TRUE => > } > src/data/Makefile.am:29: GCONF_SCHEMAS_UNINSTALLATION was already > defined in condition TRUE, which implies condition > GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL_TRUE PACKAGER_MODE_FALSE > > GCONF_SCHEMAS_UNINSTALLATION (User, where = src/data/Makefile.am:29) += > { > TRUE => > } > src/data/Makefile.am:30: SHARED_MIME_INSTALLATION was already defined in > condition TRUE, which implies condition PACKAGER_MODE_FALSE > SHARED_MIME_INSTALL_TRUE > SHARED_MIME_INSTALLATION (User, where = src/data/Makefile.am:30) += > { > TRUE => > } > src/data/Makefile.am:31: SHARED_MIME_UNINSTALLATION was already defined > in condition TRUE, which implies condition PACKAGER_MODE_FALSE > SHARED_MIME_INSTALL_TRUE > SHARED_MIME_UNINSTALLATION (User, where = src/data/Makefile.am:31) += > { > TRUE => > } > **Error**: automake failed. > > Any ideas what's going wrong here? I have previously compiled gramps > 2.0.5 from a tarball, so it seems reasonable to assume I have all the > dependencies taken care of. > > I've tried to track down these symbols a bit, which led me to think that > fiddling with --disable-mime-install etc etc might help, but nothing > I've tried has made a difference. > > Tim > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel -- You can normally find me on Jabber as Ric...@ja... |
From: Don A. <don...@co...> - 2005-08-16 18:55:55
|
Yesterday I mentioned that we were trying to determine if there was a demand for a printed GRAMPS User's Manual. The idea is to provide a low cost, but high quality softback book (something like the O'Reilly books) for those who are more comfortable with a hard copy book instead of an online manual. I've set up a poll at http://gramps-project.org where you can anonymously provide us feedback. Again, this is not a sales pitch - we're not trying to make any money. We are just trying to decide if there is enough of a demand to make the effort worthwhile. Don |
From: Don A. <don...@co...> - 2005-08-16 18:40:25
|
I will be looking into these as well. If you would, could you enter them in the bug tracker so I can make sure they don't get overlooked? Thanks. Don Eero Tamminen wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 16 August 2005 18:02, Don Allingham wrote: > >>Now that 2.0.6 is out, I would ask that people attempt to use the >>Narrative Web Page generator. 2.0.6 is the first release to include >>this, and we want to shake out the bugs. Once we feel confident about >>this, we will release 2.0.7 with all the fixes. >> >>We do know that there is a link path problem on the surname list page. >>This is being addressed now. Let us know of any other problems you may >>have. > > > On my earlier mail I had listed a few (which Alex has answered): > - Sources references list contains only one of the persons being > referenced in the database > - If person has no lastname, patronymic is not shown in the surname list > - Report doesn't apply the selected filter > > - Eero > > >>2.0.7 will also include support for spell checking (supporting multiple >>languages). > > |
From: Eero T. <eer...@ne...> - 2005-08-16 18:31:43
|
Hi, On Tuesday 16 August 2005 18:02, Don Allingham wrote: > Now that 2.0.6 is out, I would ask that people attempt to use the > Narrative Web Page generator. 2.0.6 is the first release to include > this, and we want to shake out the bugs. Once we feel confident about > this, we will release 2.0.7 with all the fixes. > > We do know that there is a link path problem on the surname list page. > This is being addressed now. Let us know of any other problems you may > have. On my earlier mail I had listed a few (which Alex has answered): - Sources references list contains only one of the persons being referenced in the database - If person has no lastname, patronymic is not shown in the surname list - Report doesn't apply the selected filter - Eero > 2.0.7 will also include support for spell checking (supporting multiple > languages). |
From: Don A. <don...@co...> - 2005-08-16 15:18:45
|
Right now it is using gtkspell, which is currently using aspell/pspell, but is adding support for enchant in the near future (http://gtkspell.sourceforge.net). This is a new feature being added to python-gnome-extras. So, installing this package will enable the feature in 2.0.7. This will be available tomorrow in the gramps20 CVS branch. Don Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On 8/16/05, Don Allingham <dal...@us...> wrote: > > >>2.0.7 will also include support for spell checking (supporting multiple >>languages). > > > Based on enchant? > > Alexandre > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Gramps-devel mailing list > Gra...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel > |
From: Alex R. <sh...@gr...> - 2005-08-16 15:16:40
|
On 08/16/2005 10:13:32 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > On 8/16/05, Don Allingham <dal...@us...> wrote: >=20 > > 2.0.7 will also include support for spell checking (supporting multiple > > languages). >=20 > Based on enchant? Based on gtkspell, which in turn is using aspell. Alex --=20 Alexander Roitman http://www.gramps-project.org |
From: Alexandre P. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-08-16 15:13:43
|
On 8/16/05, Don Allingham <dal...@us...> wrote: > 2.0.7 will also include support for spell checking (supporting multiple > languages). Based on enchant? Alexandre |
From: Don A. <dal...@us...> - 2005-08-16 15:02:29
|
Now that 2.0.6 is out, I would ask that people attempt to use the Narrative Web Page generator. 2.0.6 is the first release to include this, and we want to shake out the bugs. Once we feel confident about this, we will release 2.0.7 with all the fixes. We do know that there is a link path problem on the surname list page. This is being addressed now. Let us know of any other problems you may have. 2.0.7 will also include support for spell checking (supporting multiple languages). Don |
From: Tim A. <ti...@pr...> - 2005-08-16 13:38:24
|
I'm trying to build source I've checked out of the gramps20 branch, but not getting past square one. tim@saraswati gramps2 $ ./autogen.sh --prefix=/home/tim processing . Running aclocal ... Running automake --gnu ... src/data/Makefile.am:28: GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALLATION was already defined in condition TRUE, which implies condition GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL_TRUE PACKAGER_MODE_FALSE # Conditionally enable/disable gconf schemas or mime types, # or disable both in a packager mode GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALLATION (User, where = src/data/Makefile.am:28) += { TRUE => } src/data/Makefile.am:29: GCONF_SCHEMAS_UNINSTALLATION was already defined in condition TRUE, which implies condition GCONF_SCHEMAS_INSTALL_TRUE PACKAGER_MODE_FALSE GCONF_SCHEMAS_UNINSTALLATION (User, where = src/data/Makefile.am:29) += { TRUE => } src/data/Makefile.am:30: SHARED_MIME_INSTALLATION was already defined in condition TRUE, which implies condition PACKAGER_MODE_FALSE SHARED_MIME_INSTALL_TRUE SHARED_MIME_INSTALLATION (User, where = src/data/Makefile.am:30) += { TRUE => } src/data/Makefile.am:31: SHARED_MIME_UNINSTALLATION was already defined in condition TRUE, which implies condition PACKAGER_MODE_FALSE SHARED_MIME_INSTALL_TRUE SHARED_MIME_UNINSTALLATION (User, where = src/data/Makefile.am:31) += { TRUE => } **Error**: automake failed. Any ideas what's going wrong here? I have previously compiled gramps 2.0.5 from a tarball, so it seems reasonable to assume I have all the dependencies taken care of. I've tried to track down these symbols a bit, which led me to think that fiddling with --disable-mime-install etc etc might help, but nothing I've tried has made a difference. Tim |
From: Don A. <dal...@us...> - 2005-08-16 03:23:24
|
If you downloaded 2.0.6 today, please re-download the updated version (2.0.6-2). Some debugging code was inadvertently left in which cause the reading of XML databases to lose track of family references. Updates files are being built and uploaded now. If you have already downloaded and installed 2.0.6, the problem will be resolved if you run the "Check and repair database" tool. --=20 Don Allingham http://gramps-project.org |