Yes. Say for example a person has died without marrying or recorded relationship, it would be nice that we could somehow not have the family heading at the bottom of the relationship view. The appearance of the family header sort of suggests that the data is not complete which would be the case in case of a person who had a family and we just do not have the data yet. I hope I have been clear. Thanks.
The relationship view shows the family containing the parents
followed by a list of families for each spouse.
When you create a family you can specify a relationship type. This
will normally be "Married" but you can also specify "Unmarried".
The start and end of a marriage will normally be defined by a
marriage event and a death or divorce event. The start and end of
an unmarried relationship may be harder to define.
The "Family" heading does appear even when there are no
relationships, but there will be nothing listed under it. Is this
what you are asking about?
On 25/08/11 10:00, Albert Gouveia wrote:
In gramps in the the relationship page family is
always listed even though a person may not be married. During
the life of a person this may be ok since they might get married
at some time or the other. But after a person dies, I feel
family should not appear if we could list them as bachelor or
spinster at death. This will also help identify cases where
record is complete or incomplete vis-a-vis family. Any
suggestions. Thank you.
Villa de Gouveia