Greetings:

I also have Finnish names in my ancestry, and will need the "farm name" field too!  What would be the best field to use for farm name as it becomes part of the person's name?

Something like:
Petter Anders Annason Wass E. Stenbacka

Here is the reference information:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Finland there were no last names for most. Children were given a first name and maybe a middle, but the final name like, Annason, is really a description of who the child belonged to. Usually, The father's name was given, as in Peter's son, (Peterson), ...but sometimes the mother's name was used as in this case, Petter Annason becouse Peter was illegitimate. There was no father's name to be given. and Petter's mom's name is Anna hence Anna's son. Because of this naming system, they found there were too many with the same name so the only way to tell one from the other is to also add the name which farm or parish  the came from. Petter Anders Annason came from the Wass Farm. The name Wass should no be excluded for this basically became a part of his identity. The "e. Stenbacka" means he was born on the Stenbacka farm. Sophia, before she came here was really Brita Sophia Andersdotter (Ander's Daughrter), with Back at the end because she was born on and from the Back Farm. Apparently, Petter Anders Annasson was born on Stenbacka, moved to Back when he married his wife from there, had Sophia there, Then moved to Wass Farm where Sophia's brother was born.

Petter Anders Annason Wass e.(born in) Stenbacka (farm), He got food and a place to live for his family as compensation for work he did for the farmer. In other words was a lodger and dependant of the farmer. Later he was a soldier. He died as a "backstugusittare", (a side-cottage dweller, not owner).  He was born out of wedlock. He was married twice and had children in both marriages. Our line came from the second marriage.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey


On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:38 AM, jerome <romjerome@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Perhaps we should not translate "rufname" but leave it so
> as not to
> confuse its purpose (does any culture call it "callname"?).

Was trying to find the french translation (maybe 'prénom usuel'), I find a comment about naming for Alsacian, Swiss, German or French (maybe Belgian) people:
http://www.pantel-web.de/bw_mirror/text/t46.txt
It seems I will also use this field. So, I need to find an improved seizure scheme for my names...


Jérôme

PS: does name extension will support something like 'farm name'?


--- En date de : Mar 5.10.10, Doug Blank <doug.blank@gmail.com> a écrit :

> De: Doug Blank <doug.blank@gmail.com>
> Objet: Re: [Gramps-devel] geps021 name?
> À: "Tim Lyons" <guy.linton@gmail.com>
> Cc: gramps-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Mardi 5 octobre 2010, 16h15
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Tim
> Lyons <guy.linton@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Benny Malengier wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, call name is the given name you use, so
> there is no need for
> >> splitting
> >> up given name and slowing down entry of people. I
> myself have 3 given
> >> names,
> >> many people here have. You will see that call name
> becomes red if it is
> >> not
> >> a part of the given name.
> >>
> >
> > A given name is Robert, but the name I am called by (I
> presume this is what
> > is meant by callname) is Rob. Does that mean that my
> callname would become
> > red? If so, seems strange. [Put another way, what do
> you mean by "part
> > of"?].
>
> FYI, callname is the English translation of "rufname"... it
> isn't a
> nickname but a part of a name with a technical meaning:
>
> http://www.firstnamesgermany.com/vorname-and-rufname-about-german-given-names/
>
> Perhaps we should not translate "rufname" but leave it so
> as not to
> confuse its purpose (does any culture call it "callname"?).
> I believe
> that the new revised name object has a place for nickname,
> but I
> haven't followed the development.
>
> -Doug
>
>
> > [I appreciate that Anthony/Andy and Dorothy/Dot are
> also problematic, just
> > wondered what the validation is for?]
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://gramps.1791082.n4.nabble.com/geps021-name-tp2955196p2956070.html
> > Sent from the GRAMPS - Dev mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9
> supports
> > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and
> DOM L2 & L3.
> > Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more
> time creating great
> > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gramps-devel mailing list
> > Gramps-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9
> supports
> standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and
> DOM L2 & L3.
> Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more
> time creating great
> experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
> _______________________________________________
> Gramps-devel mailing list
> Gramps-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel
>




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________
Gramps-devel mailing list
Gramps-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gramps-devel