From: Robert Lipe <robertlipe@us...> - 2007-05-01 03:46:31
> of testing this. Does the Win32 GUI get its list of devices by doing
> gpsbabel -^3 ?
I'll let Olaf field this one, but I suspect not.
> In related news there's a patch for the new WBT-201 now:
Committed unchanged. =
Oh, I also added you to the people page, but I can't seem to push the
update to the public version yet, but will do so the next time I'm near
my computer. (That's about two weeks from now.)
Thanx for handling that, Andy.
P.S. xmalloc will never fail.
From: Robert Lipe <robertlipe@us...> - 2007-05-01 15:18:58
> > P.S. xmalloc will never fail.
> Ah, thanks. Also xstrdup then I guess?
Right. Pretty much all of my xanything functions tries to trap the "obvi=
failure cases. xfopen tests for failure and prints a (hopefully helpful)=
error, xmalloc tests for malloc failure, and so on.
> I'll change it for the next patch.
It didn't bug me enough to change it before commit (limited time and acce=
and all) but that'd be great if you can.
From: Olaf Klein <o.klein@pr...> - 2007-05-01 19:34:51
Hi Andy and Robert,
> > of testing this. Does the Win32 GUI get its list of devices by doing
> > gpsbabel -^3 ?
> I'll let Olaf field this one, but I suspect not.
Since release 1.2.8 I use the -^3 listing. I need this listing for
initialization of the module options.