Re: [gphoto-devel] Compiler warnings, mostly about signedness.

[Marcus M. <mei...@su...>]

On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 05:40:29PM -0600, ki...@ba... wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:36:52PM -0600, ki...@ba... wrote:
> >>
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> I will continue looking at these and may make some more suggestions.
> >
> > I fixed exif.c/exif.h/gphoto2-file.c/gphoto2-filesys.c (and jpeg.c).
> >
> > I do not see the warning in gphoto2-abilities-list.c with current GCC 4.3.
> > The newer compiler might have become more inteligent. :)
> >
> > Ciao, Marcus
> >
> 
> I will try out what you did right away, as it does seem already to be 
> posted.
> 
> But I am still curious about something (see the message I just sent).
> 
> What is intended with GP_FILE_ACCESSTYPE_MEMORY anyway?
> 
> Does anyone actually use this?

Yes.

If the frontend does:
	gp_file_new() it allocates such a file.
	gp_file_new_from_fd(int fd) allocates one with GP_FILE_ACCESSTYPE_FILE


The name GP_FILE_ACCESSTYPE_MEMORY is not exposed outside of the
file itself.
 
> Does anyone foresee a use for it?

I added it to be used. :)

Ciao, Marcus