Re: image/binary patch complete

[Daniel J S. <dan...@ie...>]

Ethan Merritt wrote:

>On Tuesday 31 August 2004 02:31 am, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
>  
>
>>Yes, there are several things that can be cleaned up yet, especially if 
>>the #ifdef .. #else .. #endif constructs are untangled.  And as always, 
>>one codes something up and then later realizes a way of improving 
>>things.
>>    
>>
>
>
>../term/pdf.trm:1201: warning: implicit declaration of function `rgb255_from_gray'
>
>brogar [37] grep -l rgb255_from_gray term/*.trm
>term/gd.trm
>term/pdf.trm
>term/post.trm
>
>
>Wasn't the rgb255_from_gray() function superseded by 
>rgb255maxcolors_from_gray(double gray, rgb255_color *rgb255)
>
>Should the calls be replaced in the three drivers above,
>and the original function removed altogether?
>

I didn't follow the issue there.  rgb255_from_gray() was commented out 
of CVS, then I thought maybe it was put back in for the PNG vectors 
patch.  But if it was superseded (which looks to be the case, as I see 
now that these are duplicate functions), please change as you see fit.

Dan