From: Maximilian S. <ste...@gm...> - 2008-10-23 22:46:49
|
Thank you for your quick replys. It was quite easy. Of course the line starts at (0,1), sorry for that. Because of the logarithmic scale this point can't be printed like all other points with x=0. So this is the reason why gnuplot act strange (in my opinion), it starts at the point (1,0.32) which does't exist, but (0.005,0.32) is the next existing point so 0.32 makes sense in some way. I agree that it would be nicer if gnuplot would ignore zero values on logscales or print an error. When I delete all x=0 values it works fine. The zero values have no relevance for this chart either. Thanks again for your quick replys. P.S.: 0e-20 means 0 times 10 to the power of -20 (0*10^-20) so it's 0 (in the db and in my python script it is zero, i don't know why it's exported like that). P.P.S.: 0 to the power of anything is 0. Except 0^0, that's 1 (per definition) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Error-in-curve-when-plotting-on-reverse-logarithmic-x-axis-tp20131291p20141059.html Sent from the Gnuplot - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |