From: Andrea A. <aa...@op...> - 2007-03-07 18:52:14
|
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Andrea we originally gathered up filter, sld and so on *into* main. > Because users were having such a hard time sorting out what was needed > when. > > I don't mind splitting things up; but I *do* wish that we could produce > some larger artifacts rather then the fine grained approach scene for > the xml parsing. > > Main does have a consistent story to tell; it is the default > implementation of almost all our data structures (features, filters, > sld, etc...). > > However lets try this ... > - catalog moves to data (is a better home for it anyways) > - main stays on as the home of filter and feature kind of belong together > - sld moves to renderer > - gml should be rolled into the xml parsing module This seems to be ok, +1 for me. We can discuss this on the next gt2 meeting. Look, what prompted me to suggest the split are GEOT-1165 and GEOT-1180. A user is providing us good reports on LSD failures, patches with test cases, and he's being ignored. Why? Because SLD is in no man's land, nobody feels compelled to evaluate and apply these patches. Now, this is really really bad, if we act like this we have low chance of expanding the developers group. Cheers Andrea |