Thread: [gentoo-misc] gentoo Subversion angst
Graphical file manager for Unix-like systems, using GTK+.
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
emilbrink
From: Emil B. <em...@ob...> - 2011-04-07 11:33:32
|
Hi! I just thought I'd drop a message since this is one of the few channels I have that I can pretend reach "those who care". My Subversion repo for gentoo has been killed by a disk crash, which is why development is currently halted. I had (off-site) backups, but I've not been able to get back into a working shape using them. Please see details in this question on Stack Overflow: <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5543285/how-do-i-fix-a-repository-with-one-broken-revision>, and feel free to help out if you happen to have any ideas. Regards, /Emil |
From: Emil B. <em...@ob...> - 2011-04-08 19:41:49
|
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Emil Brink <em...@ob...> wrote: > [...] >> This is a huge guess, but shouldn't the incremental option even work on >> a broken repository and let you replay on top of the healthy one? > > Thanks. I agree, I also think that it should, but when I've tried it > doesn't. I see I forgot to include this in the SO question, but > --incremental doesn't change the output at all, it still reports a > broken revision 823 even when I try to dump incrementally from > something after 823. [Bringing this back on-list, sorry]. I've amended the question on SO with the output from trying to use the --incremental option; it doesn't seem to work. Regards, /Emil |
From: Emil B. <em...@ob...> - 2011-04-09 20:45:52
|
> I've amended the question on SO with the output from trying to use the > --incremental option; it doesn't seem to work. Actually, last night in a spur of inspiration I solved it. Now I have a working revision control system at home again, so I can resume work on gentoo. Please note though, that work is taking *a lot* of my time now, so my total bandwidth is quite limited. Regards, /Emil |