From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-01-22 10:01:50
|
GO website item #882020, was opened at 2004-01-22 10:01 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=882020&group_id=36855 Category: request feature Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Assigned to: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Summary: cellular component docs Initial Comment: To be written. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=882020&group_id=36855 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-02-19 15:41:55
|
GO website item #882020, was opened at 2004-01-22 10:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jenclark You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=882020&group_id=36855 Category: request feature Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Assigned to: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Summary: cellular component docs Initial Comment: To be written. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Date: 2004-02-19 15:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=735846 This is an action item from Stanford: 4.4 Component ontology annotations Transient associations for complex.: associated with vs part of. Should we distinguish between stable components of a complex versus something that by some experiment localizes to the complex? Action item: We will add a new qualifier for Colocalizes with that is appropriate for indicating that the gene product has been found in the vicinity of a structure. Action item: Jen will update the documentation for Component rules with discussion of this qualifier and its use. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=882020&group_id=36855 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-03-23 17:12:39
|
GO website item #882020, was opened at 2004-01-22 10:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jenclark You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=882020&group_id=36855 Category: request feature Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Assigned to: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Summary: cellular component docs Initial Comment: To be written. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Date: 2004-03-23 17:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=735846 I have been looking at the cellular component ontology more generally and thinking about some things that could be addressed in the cellular component documentation. 1) What's the difference between 'extracellular', 'external encapsulating structure', 'extracellular matrix' and 'extracellular space'. 2) Why is immunoglobin complex a top level term? 3) Why is virion included in a cellular component ontology? 4) What is the difference between the top level terms ' cellular component unknown' (for annotation of gene products whose location is unknown) and ' unlocalised' (to be used as a parent for terms covering complexes whose location is unknown). 5) Talk about issues to do with whole body stuff, e.g. circulation and tissues. 6) Why is this a cellular component ontology instead of an organismal component ontology? Jen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Date: 2004-02-19 15:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=735846 This is an action item from Stanford: 4.4 Component ontology annotations Transient associations for complex.: associated with vs part of. Should we distinguish between stable components of a complex versus something that by some experiment localizes to the complex? Action item: We will add a new qualifier for Colocalizes with that is appropriate for indicating that the gene product has been found in the vicinity of a structure. Action item: Jen will update the documentation for Component rules with discussion of this qualifier and its use. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=882020&group_id=36855 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-04-07 19:03:25
|
GO website item #882020, was opened at 2004-01-22 10:01 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jenclark You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=882020&group_id=36855 Category: request feature Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Assigned to: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Summary: cellular component docs Initial Comment: To be written. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Date: 2004-04-07 12:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=735846 Could also highlight the difference between the part_of relationship in the component ontology and the part_of relationship in the process ontology. Jen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Date: 2004-03-23 17:12 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=735846 I have been looking at the cellular component ontology more generally and thinking about some things that could be addressed in the cellular component documentation. 1) What's the difference between 'extracellular', 'external encapsulating structure', 'extracellular matrix' and 'extracellular space'. 2) Why is immunoglobin complex a top level term? 3) Why is virion included in a cellular component ontology? 4) What is the difference between the top level terms ' cellular component unknown' (for annotation of gene products whose location is unknown) and ' unlocalised' (to be used as a parent for terms covering complexes whose location is unknown). 5) Talk about issues to do with whole body stuff, e.g. circulation and tissues. 6) Why is this a cellular component ontology instead of an organismal component ontology? Jen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Jennifer I Clark (jenclark) Date: 2004-02-19 15:34 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=735846 This is an action item from Stanford: 4.4 Component ontology annotations Transient associations for complex.: associated with vs part of. Should we distinguish between stable components of a complex versus something that by some experiment localizes to the complex? Action item: We will add a new qualifier for Colocalizes with that is appropriate for indicating that the gene product has been found in the vicinity of a structure. Action item: Jen will update the documentation for Component rules with discussion of this qualifier and its use. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=600519&aid=882020&group_id=36855 |