Re: [Ganglia-developers] updating gmond.. Re: CPU cycles

[Steven W. <sw...@il...>]

Personally, I think gexec could do with a major investment of quality time, 
and it could use this kind of functionality.  I like these ideas, but we 
don't want to Microsoft Office the monitoring core.

The philosophy, in a nutshell, being that the monitoring core should 
monitor, and the execution environment should execute.  :)

Lester Vecsey wrote:
> Perhaps as part of installing gmond it could be recommended to go the extra
> step to set up rysnc+ssh to distribute gmond, using the ssh-keyinstall
> script available on the net or preferably an improvement on this particular
> script that would automate the setup of ssh keys even further. Then
> replacing gmond's to a new version on even huge installations shouldn't be
> too much effort. As part of the install a unique gmond user would be
> suggested to be created to tie together all the machines.
> 
> Also how about breaking down gmond even further into a sub components that
> allow for the streaming of files through it, to/from via multicast. Then
> future versions and gexec modules etc could be streamed out, perhaps even
> wrapped through ssh encryption.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
>>>There is a fairly large user base of OSCAR installs using 2.2.3 so it is
>>
> not
> 
>>>trivial to go around to all of those and replace the version of ganglia.
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to
> $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v?
> http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm
> _______________________________________________
> Ganglia-developers mailing list
> Gan...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers